IP Brainbox

The Patent Intelligence Platform

An AI-powered Patent Intelligence Platform for decisions across the entire patent lifecycle.

Evaluate inventions, draft Office Action responses, review outside counsel work, optimize portfolios, and identify licensing opportunities. All in one patent intelligence platform.

Start with a 10-patent Expert Portfolio Review, then run the full lifecycle workspace in IP Brainbox.

Decision support only. Not legal advice, a formal appraisal, or a substitute for counsel.

Four lifecycle pillars

Every visitor should understand the architecture before they sign in.

Independent Prosecution Quality Assurance

The decision comes first. The score supports it.

Prosecution Review · IllustrativeSample output

Recommendation

Return to Counsel

Needs attention

Reason: Claim amendments likely narrow commercial scope.

Response Quality

85 Good

Legally sound overall; revise before filing due to commercial impact.

Confidence 76%

  • Estoppel acceptable
  • Rejections addressed
  • Scope narrowed
  • Commercial impact

One response. Three perspectives.

Counsel sees legal QA. Inventors see plain English. In-house counsel sees business impact.

Counsel

Legal QA: arguments, claim support, estoppel, and examiner coverage.

Inventor

Plain English summary of what changed and why it matters.

In-house

Business impact: scope, licensing risk, and filing recommendation.

Why organizations choose IP Brainbox

Single-asset report services answer what one patent may be worth. IP Brainbox answers lifecycle questions: should we file, how do we prosecute, what deserves investment, and where can we extract value?

Primary question

Single-asset report services: What may this patent be worth?

IP Brainbox: Should we file, how do we prosecute, what deserves investment, and where can we extract value?

Scope

Single-asset report services: Single-asset valuation or commercialization report

IP Brainbox: Invent → Protect → Operate → Monetize across the patent lifecycle

Typical output

Single-asset report services: Standalone PDF report

IP Brainbox: Decision packages, matter workspaces, portfolio triage, and licensing shortlists

Prosecution Review

Single-asset report services: Partner review · Email · Word comments · Manual checklist

IP Brainbox: Prosecution Review · Structured QA · Commercial review · Estoppel analysis · Filing Readiness Score

Best for

Single-asset report services: One-off valuation or transaction prep

IP Brainbox: Organizations that need an operating layer for patent decisions, not a single feature

One platform. Four workspaces.

Follow the patent from invention through monetization. Each stage has its own intelligence workspace.

Decision Packages

Illustrative packages generated by the platform. Evidence for counsel, finance, and portfolio stakeholders. Not the product itself.

Outside Counsel Review Report
Missing arguments, estoppel risks, claim support, scope reduction, examiner response likelihood, and commercial impact before filing.

Filing Readiness Score

85

Prosecution Review
  • ✓ Arguments complete
  • ✓ Claim support
  • ⚠ Missing interview recommendation
  • ⚠ Potential estoppel statement

Ready after two revisions

View example
Maintenance Decision Memo
Client-ready PDF with MFA recommendation, PSRP context, family-aware abandon warnings, and audit footer.
MPS 72Review
PayReviewAbandon

Value/fee

8.2×

Gate

7.5 yr

View example
Portfolio claim-aware decisions
Side-by-side PSRP, claim breadth, and Pay / Review / Abandon for renewal-season triage.
PatentPSRPBreadthRec.
US 10,234,567$245k78Pay
US 10,891,012$92k54Review
US 11,045,331$18k31Abandon
View example
Global Family Snapshot
Foreign family members, jurisdiction coverage, and high-level legal-status indicators linked to U.S. assets in portfolio review reports.

142

Active

28

Review queue

$1.2M

Fees (24 mo)

View example
Portfolio dashboard
Org metrics, review queue entry points, and maintenance horizon at a glance.

142

Active

28

Review queue

$1.2M

Fees (24 mo)

View example
Maintenance decision matrix
MPS score, fee window, value-to-fee ratio, payment-supporting signals, review risks, and USPTO verification checklist.
MPS 72Review
PayReviewAbandon

Value/fee

8.2×

Gate

7.5 yr

View example
Per-patent PSRP evidence
PSRP value range, peer context, category scores, claim-breadth indicators, evidence adjustment, and What Could Change This Value? inputs.

Executive Snapshot · Illustrative

$485,000

PSRP
$320k$610k
Tech 82Market 71Claims 78
View example
Scenario studio output
Compare pruning strategies and maintenance spend under different assumptions.
Baseline maintenance$890k
Prune 15% low-value$712k

12 families flagged · $178k annual savings

View example
CSV import & maintenance horizon
Import results and fee-window grouping for renewal-season planning.
portfolio.csv uploaded
48 added · 3 skipped

Maintenance horizon

11 due in 90 days · 4 in review window

View example

Trust and transparency

We design for IP, finance, and strategy teams who need to defend their numbers inside the company and with counsel.

Estimates, not appraisals
PSRP and MFA outputs are structured estimates and decision-support views. They do not replace legal counsel, formal valuation, claim charts, or USPTO filings.
Grounded in patent data sources
U.S. workflows use USPTO patent, assignment, citation, maintenance-fee, and classification data. Global Family Intelligence adds EPO-linked family and legal-status context where available.
Auditable exports
Maintenance Decision Memos, pruning summaries, and portfolio review exports include actor, timestamp, and model version for internal documentation.
Your data stays yours
Customer-uploaded documents and private portfolio data are not used to train public AI models.

Built for teams accountable for portfolio decisions

Corporate IP, university technology transfer, outside counsel, and monetization teams who need structured evidence for renewal, pruning, and licensing decisions.

Corporate IP teams
Run fee-gate review queues and action boards so renewal season is governed Pay / Review / Abandon, not ad hoc spreadsheets.
University technology transfer
Prioritize TTO budget toward patents with licensing potential, stronger claim breadth, and defensible prune candidates.
Outside counsel / IP boutiques
Deliver client-ready portfolio reviews and maintenance memos without building internal analytics infrastructure.
Monetization teams
Surface licensing candidates, weak assets, and globally supported families before campaign planning.

Start with a 10-Patent Expert Portfolio Review, or upload your first Office Action for Prosecution Review.

Two entry points: portfolio buyers begin with a fixed-fee Expert Portfolio Review; prosecution buyers start with an independent second review before filing. Then scale Invent, Protect, Operate, and Monetize.