← Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Rankings
Most Active Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Patent Prosecution Firms — 2025
Ranking of law firms by the number of U.S. patents granted in 2025 for which the firm is identified as prosecution counsel of record and the patent qualifies under IP Brainbox’s Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning technology definition.
292 qualifying grants led the 2025 ranking. The Top 50 cutoff was 31 qualifying grants (Top 50 positions; ties included). Rankings use competition ranking. Firms with equal qualifying grants share a rank. All firms tied at the public cutoff are included. Rankings reflect documented prosecution activity rather than an assessment of firm quality.
What changed
Selected editorial signals from this publication run.
- specializationArtificial Intelligence and Machine Learning accounted for 86.1% of Intelletek Law Group, PLLC’s tracked-theme patent grants in 2025.
- declineAnova Law Group, PLLC declined from 41 qualifying grants in 2024 to 20 in 2025 (-51.2%).
- declineQuarles and Brady, LLP declined from 45 qualifying grants in 2024 to 21 in 2025 (-53.3%).
- declineCrowell and Moring, LLP declined from 44 qualifying grants in 2024 to 24 in 2025 (-45.5%).
- new entrantFish & Richardson, P.C. entered the ranking at #1 with 292 qualifying Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning grants in 2025.
- specializationArtificial Intelligence and Machine Learning accounted for 76% of Garg Law Firm, PLLC’s tracked-theme patent grants in 2025.
- specializationArtificial Intelligence and Machine Learning accounted for 88.5% of Galvin Patent Law, LLC’s tracked-theme patent grants in 2025.
- declineJianq Chyun Intellectual Property Office declined from 83 qualifying grants in 2024 to 44 in 2025 (-47%).
- specializationArtificial Intelligence and Machine Learning accounted for 71.8% of Getech Law, LLC’s tracked-theme patent grants in 2025.
- scale specializationArtificial Intelligence and Machine Learning accounted for 77.8% of Amin, Turocy & Watson, LLP’s tracked-theme patent grants in 2025 (96 qualifying grants).
Measurement period: Jan. 1–Dec. 31, 2025 · Data through: September 8, 2026 · Published: September 17, 2026 · Methodology: v1.3
51 law firms ranked · Top 50 positions; ties included
Rankings measure documented patent prosecution activity, not firm quality. Firm names are normalized from prosecution counsel-of-record information in the underlying U.S. patent records. Related name variants are consolidated where they can be reliably resolved to the same organization.
51 law firms ranked
Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning theme hub · 2025 overview
Want this intelligence for your company, client, or competitor?
Public rankings show activity signals from U.S. grants. Full prosecution intelligence — allowance rates, pendency, and office-action patterns — is available in the product.
Lists use firm counsel-of-record links on U.S. granted patents that have CPC codes. Pending applications without a grant usually lack CPC and are omitted. Solo practitioners appear on attorney rankings, not firm rankings.
Decision support only — not legal advice, not a directory of “best lawyers,” and not an endorsement. Calculated statistics cannot be edited by the attorney or firm.
