Most Active Computer Vision Patent Prosecution Firms — 2025
Ranking of law firms by the number of U.S. patents granted in 2025 for which the firm is identified as prosecution counsel of record and the patent qualifies under IP Brainbox’s Computer Vision technology definition.
2,640 qualifying grants led the 2025 ranking. The Top 50 cutoff was 371 qualifying grants. Rankings use competition ranking. Firms with equal qualifying grants share a rank. All firms tied at the public cutoff are included. Rankings reflect documented prosecution activity rather than an assessment of firm quality.
What changed
Selected editorial signals from this publication run.
- Lempia Summerfield Katz LLC: High technology concentration: 73.8% of the firm’s qualifying patent activity falls within Computer Vision.
- Jianq, Chyun Intellectual Property Office: High technology concentration: 94.5% of the firm’s qualifying patent activity falls within Computer Vision. Momentum: ranks #23 with 599 qualifying grants and +16.2% YoY growth.
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLP: Computer Vision grants changed +65.9% from 2024 to 2025. High technology concentration: 79.2% of the firm’s qualifying patent activity falls within Computer Vision.
- Hanley, Flight & Zimmerman, LLC: High technology concentration: 86.9% of the firm’s qualifying patent activity falls within Computer Vision.
- Young Basile Hanlon MacFarlane P.C.: Computer Vision grants changed +34% from 2024 to 2025. High technology concentration: 78.8% of the firm’s qualifying patent activity falls within Computer Vision.
- Fenwick & West, LLP: High technology concentration: 83.9% of the firm’s qualifying patent activity falls within Computer Vision.
- Dority & Manning, P.A.: Computer Vision grants changed +28.8% from 2024 to 2025. High technology concentration: 88.2% of the firm’s qualifying patent activity falls within Computer Vision.
- Quarles & Brady LLP: High technology concentration: 86.9% of the firm’s qualifying patent activity falls within Computer Vision.
- Lee & Hayes, PLLC: High technology concentration: 87.1% of the firm’s qualifying patent activity falls within Computer Vision.
- Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.: High technology concentration: 76.3% of the firm’s qualifying patent activity falls within Computer Vision.
Measurement period: Jan. 1–Dec. 31, 2025 · Data through: September 8, 2026 · Published: September 15, 2026 · Methodology: v1.2
50 law firms ranked
Rankings measure documented patent prosecution activity, not firm quality. Firm names are normalized from prosecution counsel-of-record information in the underlying U.S. patent records. Related name variants are consolidated where they can be reliably resolved to the same organization.
50 law firms ranked
Computer Vision theme hub · 2025 overview
Want this intelligence for your company, client, or competitor?
Public rankings show activity signals from U.S. grants. Full prosecution intelligence — allowance rates, pendency, and office-action patterns — is available in the product.
Lists use firm counsel-of-record links on U.S. granted patents that have CPC codes. Pending applications without a grant usually lack CPC and are omitted. Solo practitioners appear on attorney rankings, not firm rankings.
Decision support only — not legal advice, not a directory of “best lawyers,” and not an endorsement. Calculated statistics cannot be edited by the attorney or firm.
